The Green Fire Times features SFI’s Global Sustainability Summer School, where participants "role-play, debate, write, blog, and build computer models that could be used in real-world decision making about sustainability."
Network science is illuminating never-before-seen relationships and patterns all around us. In three lectures over three nights, SFI's Mark Newman recently described some of the insights network science offers. Watch the videos.
Network science is illuminating never-before-seen relationships and patterns all around us. In three lectures over three nights this week, SFI's Mark Newman recently described some of the insights network science offers.
Graduates of SFI’s 2010 Global Sustainability Summer School have published opinion letters in a number of news outlets. Read their letters.
Several DeVargas Middle School students who are part of Project GUTS (Growing Up Thinking Scientifically), one of 28 such programs in the state hosted by the Santa Fe Institute that encourage young women and men to pursue science, technology, engineering and math careers, took time out of class to learn some real-world techniques for data collection from eight Massachusetts college students.
Steven Strogatz, SFI External Professor and Professor of applied mathematics at Cornell University, says it's traditional to teach kids subtraction right after addition. "If you can cope with calculating 23 + 9, you’ll be ready for 23 – 9 soon enough," writes Strogatz.
Pat Kossan, The Arizona Republic, Jan. 25, 2010.
In a quest to turn out better teachers, Arizona State University is shaking up its training program for K-12 educators.
This dynamic conference encourages girls in 5th-12th grade in the Santa Feregion to consider careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (often referred to as STEM).
Chris Mooney, Science Progress, looks at the National Science Foundation's latest Science and Engineering Indicators report. The latest figures on the relationship between science and the U.S. public can be used to support either a positive or a negative perspective.
Renowned author and Institute regular Cormac McCarthy’s light blue Olivetti manual typewriter, which he bought second-hand more than ve decades ago, auctioned for $254,500 in New York on December 3 – to the shock and delight of those at SFI following the sale.
Research conducted by Samuel Bowles, SFI Professor, and colleagues on small-scale societies, ranging from egalitarian hunter gatherers to hierarchical farmers and herders in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America, concludes that the degree of wealth inequality in a society is based on inheritance. This variation in inequality is explained by a dynamic model in which a population’s long-run steady-state level of inequality depends on the extent to which its most important forms of wealth are transmitted within families across generations. The passing on of material things such as farms, herds and other real property, or even knowledge, skills and other valuable resources plays a large role in whether the next generation will accumulate or maintain high wealth status.
Consider what the state of science would be without the microscope, the telescope, or a more recent technical advance like automated DNA sequencing. There would still be science, rooted in human perception and reason. But it would be far less potent than modern science, which has technologically expanded the senses, and with computers, the intellect, to explore and decipher reality, from the universe itself to the most elusive subatomic particle. The popular view is that technology is the handmaiden of science — less pure, more commercial. But in “The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves,” W. Brian Arthur, an economist, reframes the relationship between science and technology as part of an effort to come up with a comprehensive theory of innovation. In Dr. Arthur’s view, the relationship between science and technology is more symbiotic than is generally conceded. Science and technology move forward together in a kind of co-evolution. And science does not lead.
A trove of material from the first SFI Global Sustainability Summer School is available for free to the public online. The scientists highlighted the following conclusions on climate and energy: Scientific evidence that our release of greenhouse gases risks dangerously warming the climate is incontrovertible. The technologies needed to start solving the problem exist today and many are ready for large-scale implementation, though a full solution will require a major commitment to further research and innovation. These low-carbon technologies represent a large economic opportunity, but the ordinary course of innovation and technological diffusion is too slow to meet the challenge of addressing climate change. Large-scale government intervention is therefore needed to accelerate this process.